Stephen King’s come to our house to
stay. He showed up in my basement about four years ago. I listened to his book On Writing while I walked on my
treadmill. I knew about Stephen, but I have not read any of his books. (I don’t
equate listening with reading.) I love On
Writing and laughed so hard I increased my cardio workout and I was
inspired to begin writing two creepy, albeit unfinished, novels.
I haven’t read Stephen’s books
because I think his work is too scary. I believe it hovers on the dark side. I
associate Carrie, The Shining, and Kuzo with things that keep me wide-eyed
throughout the night, covers pulled to my cheekbones, just in case there is something out there. I am delighted
that Stephen’s books and movies have made him rich and happy, because that
success entitled him to write about writing.
I have watched Stephen’s movies. I
was stunned when I read his name as author when the credits rolled for The Shawshank Redemption, which runs a
close second to my favorite book and movie, The
Color Purple. I again was surprised to see Stephen’s name as the author of The Green Mile, one of the few movies I
have watched a second time, along with Shawshank
and Purple.
I admit I was quite the snob
concerning Stephen—“Oh, I don’t read those
kinds of books,” I would say, as I chose a Steinbeck or Austen from the library
shelf. However, on reflection, Grapes of
Wrath is indeed frightful, more so because it’s based on fact.
Ah, but I digress, a writing error
that would make Stephen frown.
Stephen was only a visitor during
my treadmill listening and movie viewing. He now is a permanent fixture, and
has been since my daughter Chelsea took a composition class during her
sophomore year in high school. On Writing
was the course textbook and because of it, the way I speak to my children and
even write notes to them has forever changed.
I’m not allowed to use adverbs when
I communicate with Chelsea. I learned to loathe adverbs when I listened to On Writing. I work on expunging them
from my personal writing, and now I must edit them from my speech and any notes
I write to my kids. I cringe every time I read or hear “importantly” or
“additionally.” It must be important for folks to stress the importance of what
they say or write—and in addition to add to whatever they say or write. It’s
important that such linguistic additions are no longer tolerated in my home.
I also said goodbye to the passive
voice. I’m not perfect at it, but I am aware of my passive communications. When
I slip, Chelsea (16) and Paul (13) remind and reprimand me. I no longer may
say, “Chelsea the living room needs to be vacuumed.” Instead, I must say,
“Chelsea, please vacuum the living room.” On Thursday evenings, rather than,
“Tomorrow the garbage men come, so the garbage cans have to be taken to the
street,” I say, “Chelsea and Paul, take the garbage cans and recycling to the
street.”
My son pegged my passive-parent
voice years ago. I would say something like, “Paul, you left your dirty socks
on the sofa.” He called such statements “hint, hint.” It made both of us crazy
because I wanted him to pick up his socks; him, because he would think to
himself, “Yeah, my socks are on the sofa,” and continue doing whatever he was
doing. Later, I might say, “Paul, your dirty socks need to be put in the
hamper.” He would think to himself, “Yeah, they need to go in the hamper” and
continue doing whatever he was doing. He didn’t understand my rage when I
returned an hour later and screamed at him for not putting his dirty socks in
the hamper “like I already told” him to do. It was “hint, hint.” I never came
right out and said, “Put your dirty socks in the hamper.” I do now.
It’s sometimes tough to be clear. I
often think I must explain myself, justify my words, prepare for a debate, and
talk, talk, talk, yet not communicate much of anything. I am still guilty of
“hint, hint,” but I fight it. I try to get to the point: “Paul do your
homework.” “Paul, please take out the garbage.”
Even the family messages we write on
a whiteboard are not spared passive voice correction. A few months ago, Chelsea
was quite ill with a high fever and an undetermined skin infection. She named
the red, oozing mass spreading across her neck “The Matrix.” She was afraid
that the infection, like the matrix of movie renown, was taking over her body,
starting with her neck. During those Matrix days, I wrote the following message
on the whiteboard: “The evil Matrix must be destroyed.” In spite of Chelsea’s
fever and pain, she scrawled “passive voice” across my whiteboard note.
At that time, we also used soap
crayons to write notes on the shower walls. I made certain my next Matrix note
was not passive. My blue-crayoned note read: “Vanquish the Matrix!” Chelsea’s
reply: “Beware! The Matrix lives… on Chelsea’s washcloth!”
Chelsea and Paul have read and
continue to read Stephen King’s books, and their speech is more concise because
of that reading. Their writing is, too.
Paul is writing a book. The content
is grim: The dark side is taking over the world. Demons have thus far killed
every character I like. I know a huge battle between good and evil looms and it
scares me. Paul begs me to read his book, and like Stephen King’s novels, I
avoid it. However, Paul is my son, so sometimes I have no choice, although I
will not read his book after dark. Paul assures me good will triumph, but it’s
tough reading until that happens. I read a chapter last week. The story
continues to be bleak, but the prose is sparse, clean, clear. The writing is
tight. The voice is active. There are no adverbs. Stephen would be proud.
Written August 7, 2006, 7:41 p.m.
Note: While cleaning my closet at
5:30 this morning, I happened upon this essay. It’s been five years since I
wrote it, but the presence of Stephen King always makes for an interesting
life.